RABIES
Rabies is transmitted in saliva,
and is a zoonosis of great significance in global MPM.
" The ancient disease of
rabies is a perennial component of any review of zoonotic diseases
and a subject on which the veterinary practitioner is approached
almost daily for advice. In the United States, the number of cases
of human and domestic animal rabies has been dramatically reduced
over the last three decades. In spite of the fact that there have
been less than two cases of human rabies on average per year over
the last 10 years [in the U.S.], the virtually inevitable fatal
outcome following the development of clinical signs has ensured a
high level of priority to the surveillance and control of this
disease. "1
We have used the quote above from
North America for two reasons: first, it neatly explains why we
need to consider this exotic disease here; and second, the paper
is a fine review of how rabies works in a country where it has
been endemic for a very long time.
The situation in Australia and New
Zealand is somewhat different:
Australia and New Zealand do not
have endemic rabies. Rabies, however, is present in most of the
world except Oceania, Melanesia, Japan, Taiwan, UK, Ireland and
Sweden. Most important to us, rabies is present in most of
Indonesia apart from Irian Jaya. There is concern that if rabies
becomes established in Irian Jaya, it can cross to PNG and then to
Australia and New Zealand.
Three people have died of rabies in
Australia: an unconfirmed case in 1867, and two recent cases in
1987 and 1990. Both recent cases were undiagnosed before death.
This was not surprising since there was no history or recent
travel outside Australia.
The first case was a 9-year-old boy
who died in Brisbane. The likely source of the virus was a monkey
bite in India 16 months before the illness. The second case was a
10-year-old girl who died in Sydney from encephalitis in 1990.
This girl was a Vietnamese immigrant who had come from North
Vietnam to Australia via Hong Kong. The presumed incubation period
was very long, at least 6 years and 3 months.
The rabies virus is not one
discrete disease organism as is commonly thought. Rather, there
are different rabies-related viruses, different animal
susceptibilities to rabies infection, and different rabies
biotypes. All these factors affect where this virus fits into the
scheme of things (phylogeny) and how it operates (its epidemiology).
There are at least six
rabies-related viruses. Each is serologically different.
Australian Bat Lyssavirus, which recently caused the death of a
woman in Rockhampton, is one such virus. They all cause
rabies-like diseases, but rabies itself is the pathogen of
greatest significance to human health. It is designated serotype
1.
All warm-blooded animals are
vulnerable to infection with rabies but there are variations in
their relative susceptibilities. For a table of animal
susceptibilities, see Geering et al.2
Analysis of the relative
susceptibilities suggests that dingoes, dogs and their hybrids are
the most important potential rabies hosts in northern Australia;
red foxes are the most important potential hosts in the south of
the continent. Native animals, cats, bats and rodents represent
potential reservoir populations, depending on their local
densities. In an urban environment, dogs and urban foxes are the
most likely reservoirs but cats, and even brush-tailed possums,
could be significant hosts.3
As well as victim animals varying
in susceptibility to infection, the rabies virus itself comes in a
range of different biotypes. These different biotypes are adapted
to prefer specific types of host animals.
If an animal is infected by a
non-compatible biotype, the virus will still kill, but it is
unlikely to be passed on to other animals of the same type. For
example, if a dog were bitten by a rabid dog infected with the dog
biotype (urban rabies), both dogs would certainly die and, in the
process, the bitten dog would most likely infect other dogs. On
the other hand, if a cat were bitten by the same rabid dog, the
cat would die from the infection, but would be most unlikely to
pass the disease to other cats. In the case of the bitten dog, the
biotype is matched while for the bitten cat, the biotype is
mismatched. Different biotypes are of great significance in the
epidemiology of rabies.
Biotype examples include biotypes
adapted to skinks, red and Arctic foxes, raccoons, insectivorous
and vampire bats, jackals, meerkats and mongooses, most of which
are alien to Australia and New Zealand.
Most researchers believe that
biotypes which have adapted to overseas wildlife species are
unlikely to be introduced into Australia or New Zealand. The dog
biotype (urban rabies) is a much greater risk here because dogs we
have aplenty. If the dog biotype became established here, then
there would be a further risk that the virus might mutate to adapt
to native and feral species. This would be very serious, since
this would create a reservoir of infection that would be very
difficult to eradicate.3
In the event of a rabies-like case
(human or animal) being reported to authorities in Australia or
New Zealand, a series of questions have to be answered to decide
what action needs to be taken:
1. Are the history and symptoms
consistent with a rabies-like viral infection?
2. Is it likely (or possible) that
the infection occurred from an animal in Australia or New Zealand?
3. Has a rabies-like causal
organism been isolated?
4. If yes, which serotype is it?
5. If Serotype 1 (true rabies),
which biotype is it?
Different answers will require
different responses.
Plans to control and eradicate a
number of animal diseases in Australia are contained in a series
of manuals under the common title of AUSVETPLAN (Australian
Veterinary Emergency Plan). 3
For most serious animal diseases, the manuals outline an immediate
response. They are continuously updated so that they take account
of the latest technology and information (See web site
http//www.brs.gov.au.brs/aphb/aha/ausvet.htm).
It was the responses outlined in AUSVETPLAN that were so
successful in containing a recent outbreak of avian influenza at
Bendigo.
Many diseases (apart from rabies)
can cause aggression in domestic pets eg. canine distemper
infections commonly cause encephalitis and rabies-like aggression.
Inadequate socialisation, training and management are even more
common causes of aggression. Aggression caused by rabies is a most
unlikely scenario. But it is one that must always be in the back
of PMOsí minds.
If an outbreak does occur, PMOs in
local government together with veterinary and medical
practitioners, will be in the frontline. They may be the people
who sound the first alarm. Help is close to hand. In
Australia PMOs can call the Exotic Diseases Hotline: ph1800 675
888.
But in an emergency, notifying the
authorities may need to wait until the animal and the victims are
dealt with. Just in case, every PMO needs to know what to do if
they suspect they are facing a rabid dog. The following advice
comes from Exotic Diseases in Animals: a field guide for
Australian veterinarians:2
Potentially rabid animals should be
approached and handled with extreme caution. Every effort should
be made to capture and confine them safely. Nets or dog-catching
poles with stout rope or wire loops can be used for small animals,
and ropes or other restraints of large animals. Containers, cages
or pens should be very strongly constructed and well secured. If a
suspected case is first presented at a veterinary clinic, it
should be hospitalised away from other animals. Confined suspected
rabid animals should not be left in the care of lay persons unless
this is absolutely unavoidable.
If the animal cannot be safely
captured or confined, and therefore constitutes a risk to people
or other animals, it should be destroyed immediately in such a way
that the brain is not damaged. Shooting through the heart is
recommended ...
If a person is bitten by a suspected rabid
animal, or if a fresh wound or skin abrasion is contaminated with
its saliva or tissue fluids, the wound should be washed
immediately and flushed with soap and water, detergent, or water
alone. A disinfectant should then be applied. Quaternary ammonium
compounds, halide or phenolic are satisfactory. Puncture wounds
should be gently probed with antiseptic, taking care to minimise
further trauma. The patient should then seek immediate medical
attention with a view to obtaining a post-exposure treatment
course of vaccine and antiserum. The treatment course may be
suspended if laboratory examination conclusively shows that the
animal was not rabid.
1.
Perry BD. 1987. Rabies. In: August JR, Loar AS. (eds). Zoonotic diseases. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 17(1): 73-89.
2.
Geering WA, Forman AJ, Nunn MJ. 1995. Rabies. In: Exotic Diseases of Animals: a field guide for Australian veterinarians. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service: 203-217.
3.
Banks DJD. 1992. Rabies: a forceful argument for urban animal management. In: Murray RW, editor. Urban Animal Management: proceedings of the First National Conference on Urban Animal Management in Australia (Brisbane, 1992). Mackay QLD: Chiron Media: 59-69.
|