www.petnet.com.au

What You Should Know About Liability for Injuries Caused
by Dogs at Home and at Large
Peter K. Hennessy
Abstract
The law relating to liability of dogs for injuries to others
has ancient origins in the law. The common law divided animals
into two classes : "dangerous" and "harmless".
Dogs have been generally classified as harmless animals and in
order for a person who kept a dog to be liable for an injury
inflicted, the person needed to know from past conduct that the
dog was likely to behave in a vicious way. As well as this action
(known as scienter) for injuries caused by a harmless dog, the
common law also allows for actions to be brought for negligence
or nuisance for harm inflicted by a dog. Most states of Australia
now have legislation relating to the ownership and control of
dogs. Queensland is the only state that relies exclusively on
the common law. In general terms the owner or person in control
of the dog may be subject to both criminal and civil liability
for any injuries that the dog inflicts. In New South Wales, however,
liability does not extend to an injury suffered on land on which
the dog is ordinarily kept. Both a comprehensive registration
scheme for dogs and common rules for liability for injuries caused
by dogs, whether on private or public land, would appear to be
desirable.
About the author
Peter K. Hennessy LLB BEc
Executive Director
New South Wales Law Reform Commission
GPO Box 5199
SYDNEY
AUSTRALIA 2001
Phone (02)252 3855
Fax (02)247 1054
Peter Hennessy is the Executive Director of the New South
Wales Law Reform Commission. He has a law degree from the University
of Western Australia and an Economics Degree from the Australian
National University. For the past ten years he has worked in
the area of law reform with the Australian and New South Wales
Law Reform Commissions. He has been with the New South Wales
Law Reform Commission for the past three years and is involved
in all the Commissions current projects. The New South Wales
Law Reform Commission during the 25 years of its operation has
conducted two projects relevant to the liability of dogs. In
1970 it produced a report, "Civil Liability for Animals",
and in 1988 a report, "Liability for Injuries Caused by
Dogs".
|